In a stunning move sure to bring publicity to his campaign, Libertarian Party presidential nominee Gary Johnson has filed an anti-trust claim against the National Commission on Presidential Debates. Johnson aims to secure a spot in the debates and give America a real choice in 2012.
The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, “maintains that the Republican and Democratic Parties, through the CPD, indefensibly limit access of other candidates to the marketplace of ideas and the opportunity to be employed in these highest offices in the land, and in so doing are violating the Sherman Anti-Trust Act of 1890.”
The suit was filed within hours of the announcement that only Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney and Democratic incumbent President Barack Obama would be allowed to take part in the debates. According the debate website, the commission’s purpose is to “to ensure that debates, as a permanent part of every general election, provide the best possible information to viewers and listeners.”
How can they fulfill their stated mission if they exclude a viable alternative for the 30% of independent voters in America? That is precisely the question that the Johnson campaign is asking and demanding answers to. In addition, the campaign says that it will be filing more claims in other jurisdictions against the commission. Good for you, Gary Johnson. Be libertarian
I don’t support Gary Johnson and won’t be voting for him (or anyone) BUT good on him for challenging the monopoly that the “two party” (really only one party with the illusion of choice) system has on politics in this country.
(Source: libertyfan93, via classical-liberal)
-
littlebr4d likes this
-
readalfa reblogged this from libertyfan93 and added:
I’m not a libertarian and I wouldn’t vote for Gary Johnson, but YES.
-
ferretical likes this
-
reblooged reblogged this from bonefromthevoid and added:
Reblooged~!
-
staticdiplomat reblogged this from theantistatist and added:
Interesting
-
hashley00 likes this
-
the-liberty-republican likes this
-
originalgrissel likes this
-
thelastmohawkin reblogged this from kelly-black
-
thelastmohawkin likes this
-
kelly-black reblogged this from theantistatist and added:
Yayy!!
-
stasiapepper likes this
-
beveryhungalways likes this
-
tumblsizing reblogged this from classical-liberal
-
pianostoburn likes this
-
gavinvz likes this
-
jaycereinhardt reblogged this from theantistatist
-
life-liberty-and-rockandroll likes this
-
theantistatist reblogged this from classical-liberal and added:
I don’t support Gary Johnson and won’t be voting for him (or anyone) BUT good on him for challenging the monopoly that...
-
exciteddomination likes this
-
ninety-nineandonehalfdays reblogged this from classical-liberal
-
only-conservative-here likes this
-
lalibertarienne reblogged this from classical-liberal
-
classical-liberal reblogged this from libertyfan93
-
colleenkmichaels likes this
-
phelanflan likes this
-
fuckyeahhankrearden reblogged this from nerdylibertarian
-
nonreductivesoul likes this
-
nerdylibertarian reblogged this from bothersomeboredom and added:
Besides Anti-Trust Law, I think they have a case for filing a suit and leveling criminal charges with respect to the...
-
libertariantaoist reblogged this from theonecalledbiz
-
writerwhocouldntwrite likes this
-
noxnoctis17 reblogged this from bothersomeboredom
-
bothersomeboredom likes this
-
theonecalledbiz reblogged this from bothersomeboredom and added:
KICK BUTT, GARY JOHNSON! YOU DESERVE TO BE IN THE DEBATES! AND JILL STEIN TOO.
-
50-shades-of-red-white-and-blue reblogged this from libertyfan93
-
50-shades-of-red-white-and-blue likes this
-
This was featured in #Election 2012
-
againstpower likes this
-
bonefromthevoid reblogged this from libertyfan93 and added:
the headline is dumb, but I concur! go Johnson go! If more people had access to his opinions, I honestly believe he...
-
awesomeness2 likes this
-
idontmakemonkeys likes this
-
libertyfan93 posted this